by Týsköll » Sun Mar 16, 2025 9:29 am
Tom Sawyer wrote: Sat Mar 15, 2025 7:17 pm
QuoVadis wrote: Tue May 07, 2024 5:56 am
...Have you also developed something of your own unique approach?
yes, I do it my own style, with hand gestures and mouth sounds, I make use of vectors, intuitive real time signal interpretation, and some sort of personal mudras
Absolutely the best way in my opinion, ones own style, whilst still adhering to the foundations we see in all systems. This usually happens just by default as the person finds out "what works".
You're a chaote (no not in the edgelord style) in this way, an eclecticist.
"intuitive real time signal interpretation" - This can be really powerful, as well as truly delusional. Especially where the practitioner isn't reality checking themselves and has no-one around them pointing out flaws, or outright errors.
You can expose charlatans that claim this by baiting them with false info they try to claim knowledge of.
How've you found it in terms of having to check yourself? So often the biases or existing energies of our own systems can affect, modulate even, the incoming data in such a way that causes it to be interpreted a certain way, where the reality is the raw data has no such weight applied.
I guess I'm asking, have you ever realized you were wrong and thought "wait, no I'm a dickhead" and accepted it as so?
I'm sure you know the types that refuse evidence of their error, even double or triple down and fuel what becomes a delusion.
[quote="Tom Sawyer" post_id=2115 time=1742066240 user_id=66]
[quote=QuoVadis post_id=1996 time=1715061399 user_id=320]
...Have you also developed something of your own unique approach?
[/quote]
yes, I do it my own style, with hand gestures and mouth sounds, I make use of vectors, intuitive real time signal interpretation, and some sort of personal mudras
[/quote]
Absolutely the best way in my opinion, ones own style, whilst still adhering to the foundations we see in all systems. This usually happens just by default as the person finds out "what works".
You're a chaote (no not in the edgelord style) in this way, an eclecticist.
[b][i]"intuitive real time signal interpretation"[/i][/b] - This can be really powerful, as well as truly delusional. Especially where the practitioner isn't reality checking themselves and has no-one around them pointing out flaws, or outright errors.
You can expose charlatans that claim this by baiting them with false info they try to claim knowledge of.
How've you found it in terms of having to check yourself? So often the biases or existing energies of our own systems can affect, modulate even, the incoming data in such a way that causes it to be interpreted a certain way, where the reality is the raw data has no such weight applied.
I guess I'm asking, have you ever realized you were wrong and thought "wait, no I'm a dickhead" and accepted it as so?
I'm sure you know the types that refuse evidence of their error, even double or triple down and fuel what becomes a delusion.
